netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: sh_eth alignment fix for sh7724 using NET_IP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aec7e5c30912142322w21fb4a1bved19f7344f1cf1a5@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:22:11 +0900
From:	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sh_eth alignment fix for sh7724 using NET_IP_ALIGN

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:15 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> NET_IP_ALIGN is never != 2 on SUPERH
>
> SH_ETH depends on SUPERH
>
> It's a fantasy ifdef, of sorts. :-)

Sure, but _maybe_ someone will put the sh_eth hardware block together
with MIPS or ARM in the future. I guess it makes more sense to just
use the NET_IP_ALIGN value blindly and not care so much about what is
known working and what is not...?

Cheers,

/ magnus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html