netdev - Re: gianfar select

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091223.222938.241429611.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:29:38 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	B05799@...escale.com
Cc:	krkumar2@...ibm.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org, avorontsov@...mvista.com,
	galak@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: gianfar select_queue bogosity

From: "Kumar Gopalpet-B05799" <B05799@...escale.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:34:23 +0530

> What if I want to maintaing a 1-1 mapping b/w the Rx/Tx queues.
> For eg., I want a packet received on queue-1 on eth0 to be forwarded on
> to queue-1 on eth1.

That's what the default code does when forwarding/bridging!

And for locally generated packets it uses the flow hash.

What do you think we do by default?  Go read the code :-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html