[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B375EAD.8050204@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:18:37 -0500
From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Alacrityvm-devel] [GIT PULL] AlacrityVM guest drivers for 2.6.33
On 12/27/09 4:15 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/23/2009 11:21 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> That said, you are still incorrect. With what I proposed, the model
>> will run as an in-kernel vbus device, and no longer run in userspace.
>> It would therefore improve virtio-net as I stated, much in the same
>> way vhost-net or venet-tap do today.
>>
>
> That can't work. virtio-net has its own ABI on top of virtio, for
> example it prepends a header for TSO information. Maybe if you disable
> all features it becomes compatible with venet, but that cripples it.
>
You are confused. The backend would be virtio-net specific, and would
therefore understand the virtio-net ABI. It would support any feature
of virtio-net as long as it was implemented and negotiated by both sides
of the link.
-Greg
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (268 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists