[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100111.155537.166350032.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:55:37 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: socketcan@...tkopp.net
Cc: wg@...ndegger.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, mkl@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v3] can: Unify droping of invalid tx skbs
and netdev stats
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:19:21 +0100
> static netdev_tx_t vcan_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> {
> + struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
> struct net_device_stats *stats = &dev->stats;
> int loop;
>
> + if (unlikely(skb->len != sizeof(*cf) || cf->can_dlc > 8)) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + stats->tx_dropped++;
> + return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> + }
> +
...
> +/* Drop a given socketbuffer if it does not contain a valid CAN frame. */
> +static inline int can_dropped_invalid_skb(struct net_device *dev,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + const struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
> +
> + if (unlikely(skb->len != sizeof(*cf) || cf->can_dlc > 8)) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> struct net_device *alloc_candev(int sizeof_priv, unsigned int echo_skb_max);
Why are you not using the new helper function in vcan_tx()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists