netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v3] can: Unify droping of invalid tx skbs and netdev stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:32:11 +0100
From:	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	wg@...ndegger.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, mkl@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v3] can: Unify droping of invalid tx skbs
 and netdev stats

David Miller wrote:
> From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:19:21 +0100
> 
>>  static netdev_tx_t vcan_tx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>  {
>> +	struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
>>  	struct net_device_stats *stats = &dev->stats;
>>  	int loop;
>>  
>> +	if (unlikely(skb->len != sizeof(*cf) || cf->can_dlc > 8)) {
>> +		kfree_skb(skb);
>> +		stats->tx_dropped++;
>> +		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>> +	}
>> +
>  ...
>> +/* Drop a given socketbuffer if it does not contain a valid CAN frame. */
>> +static inline int can_dropped_invalid_skb(struct net_device *dev,
>> +					  struct sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> +	const struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
>> +
>> +	if (unlikely(skb->len != sizeof(*cf) || cf->can_dlc > 8)) {
>> +		kfree_skb(skb);
>> +		dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
>> +		return 1;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  struct net_device *alloc_candev(int sizeof_priv, unsigned int echo_skb_max);
> 
> Why are you not using the new helper function in vcan_tx()?

I just wanted the vcan driver keep off including "include/linux/can/dev.h"
which is intended for 'real' CAN hardware.

As the vcan software devices do not need the bitrate-setting and skb echo
handling from the driver library for real CAN devices, this inline function
would be the only reason to include ".../dev.h"

But i don't have a strong preference to do it like this. Do you think i
should change it to used the defined inline function?

Regards,
Oliver

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html