[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100121164801.416170b9@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:48:01 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
To: jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] e100: Fix workqueue race
(Incidentally this doesn't seem to be the only net driver that looks
suspect here)
e100: Fix the TX workqueue race
From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Nothing stops the workqueue being left to run in parallel with close or a
few other operations. This causes double unmaps and the like.
See kerneloops.org #1041230 for an example
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/net/e100.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/e100.c b/drivers/net/e100.c
index 5c7a155..5e02e4f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e100.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e100.c
@@ -2232,7 +2232,7 @@ err_rx_clean_list:
return err;
}
-static void e100_down(struct nic *nic)
+static void e100_do_down(struct nic *nic)
{
/* wait here for poll to complete */
napi_disable(&nic->napi);
@@ -2245,6 +2245,15 @@ static void e100_down(struct nic *nic)
e100_rx_clean_list(nic);
}
+/* For the non TX timeout case we want to kill the tx timeout before
+ we do this otherwise a parallel tx timeout will make a nasty mess. */
+
+static void e100_down(struct nic *nic)
+{
+ cancel_work_sync(&nic->tx_timeout_task);
+ e100_do_down(nic);
+}
+
static void e100_tx_timeout(struct net_device *netdev)
{
struct nic *nic = netdev_priv(netdev);
@@ -2261,7 +2270,7 @@ static void e100_tx_timeout_task(struct work_struct *work)
DPRINTK(TX_ERR, DEBUG, "scb.status=0x%02X\n",
ioread8(&nic->csr->scb.status));
- e100_down(netdev_priv(netdev));
+ e100_do_down(netdev_priv(netdev));
e100_up(netdev_priv(netdev));
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists