[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100128125317.GA8931@ff.dom.local>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:53:17 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...-begemot.co.uk>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CBQ broken in 2.6
On 27-01-2010 13:28, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> Thanks it is indeed sch_cbq.c,
>
> I have been going through the code in the meantime and found a place
> where cl->tparent can be modified further down in the routine in
> question. There is an invocation of cbq_set_lss() around the end of
> cbq_change_class() which can do that.
>
> I am rebuilding the kernel for my CBQ box with a few printks at the
> moment to see if it modified there or not.
>
> In any case here is the tell-tale symptom:
>
> class cbq 1:16 parent 1: leaf 76: rate 5600Kbit (bounded,isolated) prio
> 2
> Sent 162051 bytes 925 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> borrowed 201 overactions 0 avgidle 78 undertime 0
>
> That is a bounded class. Its borrowed should be always 0 no matter what.
> That is basically a broken CBQ implementation.
>
> An elementary network test suite shows the same result - it is being
> allowed to borrow.
>
> I am happy to send the whole config if necessary if someone wants to
> look at it.
Was this class created as bounded or changed later? Did it have any
child?
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists