netdev - Re: [stable] [PATCH] be2net: Bug fix to support newer generation of BE ASIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100128.215629.189699027.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:56:29 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ajitk@...verengines.com, ajitkhaparde@...il.com
Cc:	ben@...adent.org.uk, greg@...ah.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	stable-review@...nel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] be2net: Bug fix to support newer generation
 of BE ASIC

From: Ajit Khaparde <ajitkhaparde@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:21:59 +0530

> I plan rectify the error pointed by Ben and Greg and spin the patch again and
> resend it.  Please let me know if you think otherwise.

I already made the obvious memset() arg fix in my tree
as I said I would in my reply to Ben's posting.

It never makes sense to 'respin' patches I've already
applied to net-2.6, once I push it out to kernel.org
it's irreversable so you must send relative fixes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html