netdev - Re: [stable] [PATCH] be2net: Bug fix to support newer generation of BE ASIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100129064747.GA11514@serverengines.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:17:49 +0530
From:	Ajit Khaparde <ajitk@...verengines.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	ajitkhaparde@...il.com, ben@...adent.org.uk, greg@...ah.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable-review@...nel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] be2net: Bug fix to support newer generation
 of BE ASIC

On 28/01/10 21:56 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ajit Khaparde <ajitkhaparde@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:21:59 +0530
> 
> > I plan rectify the error pointed by Ben and Greg and spin the patch again and
> > resend it.  Please let me know if you think otherwise.
> 
> I already made the obvious memset() arg fix in my tree
> as I said I would in my reply to Ben's posting.
I never saw this mail. Probably its lost for good.
It did not even show up on
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/43852

Thanks
> 
> It never makes sense to 'respin' patches I've already
> applied to net-2.6, once I push it out to kernel.org
> it's irreversable so you must send relative fixes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html