| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100130215026.GA6146@localhost.localdomain> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:50:26 -0500 From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ben@...adent.org.uk, eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] r8169: straighten out overlength frame detection (v3) On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:16:46AM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 10:45:04PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > [...] > > In my opinion if you reset, you give them more power. > > > > Instead of just dropping the next few frames, you allow them > > to cause a drop of how ever many RX frames can arrive during > > the reset period _PLUS_ the amount of other RX frames which > > were in the receive ring at the point of detection. > > Sure. > > The fragmented frame test has been moved a few lines up, before checking > for the status bits. Exceedingly small frames are detected and dropped > as well. > > I have spent the evening disrupting the communication. As a challenger > one does not even need complete control : send a few random packets and > the card goes to neverland. :o/ > > I'll do some tests limiting the crap at the first packet. > Any further results you can share with us Francois? Thanks Neil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists