[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100204194744.GA4185@x200>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 21:47:44 +0200
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, jonathan@...masters.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.33] conntrack: restrict runtime hashsize
modifications
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:04:34PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >> Jon Masters correctly points out that conntrack hash sizes
> >> (nf_conntrack_htable_size) are global (not per-netns) and
> >> modifiable at runtime via /sys/module/nf_conntrack/hashsize .
> >>
> >> Steps to reproduce:
> >> clone(CLONE_NEWNET)
> >> [grow /sys/module/nf_conntrack/hashsize]
> >> exit()
> >>
> >> At netns exit we are going to scan random memory for conntracks to be killed.
> >>
> >> Apparently there is a code which deals with hashtable resize for
> >> init_net (and it was there befode netns conntrack code), so prohibit
> >> hashsize modification if there is more than one netns exists.
> >>
> >> To change hashtable sizes, you need to reload module.
> >>
> >> Expectation hashtable size was simply glued to a variable with no code
> >> to rehash expectations, so it was a bug to allow writing to it.
> >> Make "expect_hashsize" readonly.
> >>
> >> This is temporarily until we figure out what to do.
> >
> > How about alternatively moving nf_conntrack_hsize into the
> > per-namespace struct? It doesn't look more complicated or
> > intrusive and would allow to still change the init_net
> > hashsize. Also seems less hackish :)
>
> How about this (so far untested) patch? The htable_size is moved into
> the per-namespace struct and initialized from the current (global)
> value of nf_conntrack_htable_size. Changes through sysfs are still
> permitted, but only affect the init namespace and newly created ones.
No matter what we do, it's a hack!
> Additionally I removed reinitializing the hash random value when
> changing the hash size since that also requires to rehash in all
> namespaces.
I'm not fond of this, because we're not even closely going to allow changing
hashtable size per-netns. As such having actual per-netns hashtable size
just slows down everything.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists