lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1265314734.2861.521.camel@tonnant>
Date:	Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:18:54 -0500
From:	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.33] conntrack: restrict runtime hashsize
 modifications

On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 17:27 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >> Jon Masters correctly points out that conntrack hash sizes
> >> (nf_conntrack_htable_size) are global (not per-netns) and
> >> modifiable at runtime via /sys/module/nf_conntrack/hashsize .
> >>
> >> Steps to reproduce:
> >> 	clone(CLONE_NEWNET)
> >> 	[grow /sys/module/nf_conntrack/hashsize]
> >> 	exit()
> >>
> >> At netns exit we are going to scan random memory for conntracks to be killed.
> >>
> >> Apparently there is a code which deals with hashtable resize for
> >> init_net (and it was there befode netns conntrack code), so prohibit
> >> hashsize modification if there is more than one netns exists.
> >>
> >> To change hashtable sizes, you need to reload module.
> >>
> >> Expectation hashtable size was simply glued to a variable with no code
> >> to rehash expectations, so it was a bug to allow writing to it.
> >> Make "expect_hashsize" readonly.
> >>
> >> This is temporarily until we figure out what to do.
> > 
> > How about alternatively moving nf_conntrack_hsize into the
> > per-namespace struct? It doesn't look more complicated or
> > intrusive and would allow to still change the init_net
> > hashsize. Also seems less hackish :)
> 
> Just to avoid duplicate work, I'm currently trying that.

Bah. I already worked a set of patches to do that as I mentioned, but
you've probably done it by now - can clean up and post if not :)

Jon.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ