lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100213215633.GA4345@frolo.macqel> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:56:33 +0100 From: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@...qel.be> To: chas@....nrl.navy.mil, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] atm : fix /sys/devices/virtual/atm/X/carrier(ATM_PHY_SIG_UNKNOWN) When trying to design udev rules to automate usage of cxacru usb atm (adsl) modem, I have discovered that /sys/devices/virtual/atm/cxacru0/carrier had the value '1' while actually carrier was not yet established and real carrier state was not yet known to linux. I propose to fix that by using '?' as the /sys/devices/virtual/atm/cxacru0/carrier value when carrier state is not yet known to linux. Any other value except '1' would also be OK for me. -- Currently, just after the interface creation, /sys/devices/virtual/atm/cxacru0/carrier gives wrong info (carrier = 1), while actually carrier is unknown. Fix that. Signed-off-by: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@...qel.be> --- a/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c 2010-02-13 22:54:04.598847195 +0100 +++ b/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c 2010-02-13 19:13:45.395308531 +0100 @@ -63,9 +63,9 @@ static ssize_t show_carrier(struct devic char *pos = buf; struct atm_dev *adev = to_atm_dev(cdev); - pos += sprintf(pos, "%d\n", - adev->signal == - adev->signal == ATM_PHY_SIG_LOST ? 0 : 1); + pos += sprintf(pos, "%c\n", + adev->signal == ATM_PHY_SIG_FOUND ? '1' : + adev->signal == ATM_PHY_SIG_LOST ? '0' : '?'); return pos - buf; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists