[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B7D17CE.6010805@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:34:54 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Ramblewski David <David.Ramblewski@...sorigin.com>
CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel stack trace using conntrack
Ramblewski David wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> The conntrack patch works successfully.
>
>>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
>>> index 0ffe689..d2657aa 100644
>>> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
>>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
>>> @@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ ctnetlink_change_status(struct nf_conn *ct, const struct nlattr * const cda[])
>>> unsigned int status = ntohl(nla_get_be32(cda[CTA_STATUS]));
>>> d = ct->status ^ status;
>>>
>>> - if (d & (IPS_EXPECTED|IPS_CONFIRMED|IPS_DYING))
>>> + if (d & (IPS_EXPECTED|IPS_DYING))
>>> /* unchangeable */
>>> return -EBUSY;
>> I think that we should explicitly report if the user unsets
>> IPS_CONFIRMED. Please, don't change this.
>>
>> Apart from that, the patch seems fine to me. Thanks!
>
> Problem is we now (I mean after my patch) enter
> ctnetlink_change_status() with ct->status being null (or at least,
> IPS_CONFIRMED not set)
Pablo, please let me know whether you want me to apply this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists