[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1266541970.1891.109.camel@vi2.jf.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:12:50 -0800
From: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...ux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, vasu.dev@...el.com
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/3] vlan: adds vlan_dev_select_queue
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 08:37 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > This means vlan_netdev_ops & vlan_netdev_accel_ops not to be const
> > anymore so that vlan_dev_select_queue() could be initialized to vlan
> ops
> > based on real dev ndo_select_queue() present or not, should be okay
> to
> > be not const anymore. I'll update patch as suggested.
>
> No they should stay const
>
> I said you should mirror (copy if you prefer) the structure, one with
> a
> NULL ndo_select_queue pointer, one with a ndo_select_queue =
> vlan_dev_select_queue.
>
> Both structures are const.
>
> You must not dynamiucally change the structure, because the same
> machine
> might have a vlan over a device with no ndo_select_queue() method, and
> another vlan over a device with a ndo_select_queue()
>
I see, I'll mirror existing vlan op structs to have them w/ and w/o
vlan_dev_select_queue while having all vlan ops statically defined
const.
Thanks Eric.
Vasu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists