[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1266478630.2877.9.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:37:10 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, vasu.dev@...el.com
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/3] vlan: adds vlan_dev_select_queue
Le mercredi 17 février 2010 à 14:40 -0800, Vasu Dev a écrit :
> > > ------------------
> > >
> > > For performance reason, we could avoid calling vlan_dev_select_queue()
> > > for real devices without ndo_select_queue() handler, this would need to
> > > mirror vlan_netdev_ops & vlan_netdev_accel_ops.
> > >
>
> This means vlan_netdev_ops & vlan_netdev_accel_ops not to be const
> anymore so that vlan_dev_select_queue() could be initialized to vlan ops
> based on real dev ndo_select_queue() present or not, should be okay to
> be not const anymore. I'll update patch as suggested.
No they should stay const
I said you should mirror (copy if you prefer) the structure, one with a
NULL ndo_select_queue pointer, one with a ndo_select_queue =
vlan_dev_select_queue.
Both structures are const.
You must not dynamiucally change the structure, because the same machine
might have a vlan over a device with no ndo_select_queue() method, and
another vlan over a device with a ndo_select_queue()
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists