[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61D8D34BB13CFE408D154529C120E079138CB8@eseldmw101.eemea.ericsson.se>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:05:14 +0100
From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: <marcel@...tmann.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Daniel Martensson" <daniel.martensson@...ricsson.com>,
<kaber@...sh.net>, <stefano.babic@...ic.homelinux.org>,
<randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v3 00/12] net-caif: introducing CAIF protocol stack
David Miller wrote:
>> Hi Marcel.
>>>> CHANGE LOG:
>>>> Based on review comments from David Miller and Marcel Holtmann on the
>>>> previous patch set submitted the 16 February the following changes
>>>> have been done:
>>>> - Removed ifdef __cplusplus from caif_socket.h
>>>> - Use socket level SOL_IP for socket options SO_PRIORITY and
>>>> SO_BINDTODEVICE
>>>
>>> are you sure it is not better to use SOL_SOCKET here. At least
>>> according to man 7 socket this would make a lot more sense. My point
>>> in actually using SO_PRIORITY and SO_BINDTODEVICE is to use standard
>>> socket options that are already used by everybody else. So they know
>>> what to expect.
>>>
>> Yes, this makes sense. I'll update this.
>
>Please fix this up and resubmit your patch series so I can add
>it to the net-next-2.6 tree.
I have sent a V4 patch-set, fixing the review comments on the
V3 patch-set. But there are still review comments coming in.
Unfortunately, I am traveling until Thursday this week, without Internet access,
so if you would like me to resubmit again I will not be able to do that before
Thursday or Friday this week.
BR/Sjur
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists