[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adar5nshqyr.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:17:00 -0800
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] fix problems with NETIF_F_HIGHDMA in networking drivers v2
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
> index df3eb8c..53be462 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
> @@ -1058,7 +1058,7 @@ static void ipoib_setup(struct net_device *dev)
> dev->type = ARPHRD_INFINIBAND;
> dev->tx_queue_len = ipoib_sendq_size * 2;
> dev->features = (NETIF_F_VLAN_CHALLENGED |
> - NETIF_F_HIGHDMA);
> + NETIF_F_DMA_HIGH);
> dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE;
>
> memcpy(dev->broadcast, ipv4_bcast_addr, INFINIBAND_ALEN);
Been meaning to mention this for a bit, but ipoib is capable of handling
any DMA address, so if I understand your patch correctly, this can be
NETIF_F_DMA_64BIT instead of just DMA_HIGH.
--
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists