[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269006465.3048.39.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:47:45 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: robert@...julf.net
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pktgen node allocation
Le vendredi 19 mars 2010 à 14:35 +0100, robert@...julf.net a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet writes:
> > Le vendredi 19 mars 2010 à 09:44 +0100, Robert Olsson a écrit :
> >
> > I cannot understand how this can help.
> >
> > __netdev_alloc_skb() is supposed to already take into account NUMA
> > properties :
> >
> > int node = dev->dev.parent ? dev_to_node(dev->dev.parent) : -1;
> >
> > If this doesnt work, we should correct core stack, not only pktgen :)
> >
> > Are you allocating memory in the node where pktgen CPU is running or the
> > node close to the NIC ?
>
> I didn't say it should help the idea was to give some hooks to
> experiment and see effects with different node memory allocations.
> There are many degrees of freedom wrt buses(device)/CPU/menory.
>
Well, you said "Tested this with 10 Intel 82599 ports w. TYAN S7025
E5520 CPU's. Was able to TX/DMA ~80 Gbit/s to Ethernet wires."
I am interested to know what particular setup you did to maximize
throughput then, or are you saing you managed to reduce it ? :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists