netdev - Re: [PATCH] pktgen node allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19363.32154.39665.185451@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date:	Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:35:22 +0100
From:	robert@...julf.net
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Robert Olsson <robert@...julf.net>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pktgen node allocation


Eric Dumazet writes:
 > Le vendredi 19 mars 2010 à 09:44 +0100, Robert Olsson a écrit :
 > 
 > I cannot understand how this can help.
 > 
 > __netdev_alloc_skb() is supposed to already take into account NUMA
 > properties :
 > 
 > int node = dev->dev.parent ? dev_to_node(dev->dev.parent) : -1;
 > 
 > If this doesnt work, we should correct core stack, not only pktgen :)
 > 
 > Are you allocating memory in the node where pktgen CPU is running or the
 > node close to the NIC ?

 I didn't say it should help the idea was to give some hooks to 
 experiment and see effects with different node memory allocations.
 There are many degrees of freedom wrt buses(device)/CPU/menory.

 Cheers
				--ro

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html