netdev - Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH] can: bfin_can: switch to common Blackfin can header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:09:55 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
	oliver.hartkopp@...kswagen.de, urs.thuermann@...kswagen.de
Subject: Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH] can: bfin_can: switch to common 
	Blackfin can header

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 13:17, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
>> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 23:58, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
>>> When I say "resubmit" I've deleted your patch from my inbox
>>> and marked it "changed requested" or similar in patchwork
>>> so it doesn't show up in the todo list any more.
>>
>> i missed the relevance of your original "resubmit" because no other
>> maintainer ive worked with so far has exhibited this behavior, and
>> there wasnt any indication as to why a resubmission was necessary
>> considering no changes were made
>
> So when I ask you to resubmit something you just assume that
> I have no reason whatsoever for doing so?

like i said, the word "resubmit" did not equate exactly with "resend
the exact same patch".  your e-mail came across (wrt how most every
one else ive worked with) as "poke me again when it's ready in
mainline".  once Linus merged things, i gave you a poke.

> Do you still feel this way after people other than me also asked you
> to do the same exact thing for me?  Do you think they are making
> arbitrary requests as well?

the only other person to say anything did not say "you now need to
resend your patch".  it was "please wait until Linus has pulled things
and then Dave has pulled things".  which was not relevant at the point
it was sent.

> This is the fatal flaw in your logic and behavior.

take a chill pill man
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html