[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100322.101720.133896229.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: vapier.adi@...il.com
Cc: socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
oliver.hartkopp@...kswagen.de, urs.thuermann@...kswagen.de
Subject: Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH] can: bfin_can: switch to common
Blackfin can header
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:04:48 -0400
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 23:58, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
>> When I say "resubmit" I've deleted your patch from my inbox
>> and marked it "changed requested" or similar in patchwork
>> so it doesn't show up in the todo list any more.
>
> i missed the relevance of your original "resubmit" because no other
> maintainer ive worked with so far has exhibited this behavior, and
> there wasnt any indication as to why a resubmission was necessary
> considering no changes were made
So when I ask you to resubmit something you just assume that
I have no reason whatsoever for doing so?
Do you still feel this way after people other than me also asked you
to do the same exact thing for me? Do you think they are making
arbitrary requests as well?
This is the fatal flaw in your logic and behavior.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists