netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC] tun: add ioctl to modify vnet header size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100321.201732.186318609.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mst@...hat.com
Cc:	dlstevens@...ibm.com, David.Woodhouse@...el.com,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org,
	paul.moore@...com, sri@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] tun: add ioctl to modify vnet header size

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:11:17 +0200

> All this does is set how much of the buffer to skip, this option does
> not allocate any memory.  So if you set it to a value > length that you
> passed in, you get -EINVAL. Anything else should work.  Negative values
> are checked for and return -EINVAL when you try to set it.  At least,
> all that's by design - pls take a look at the code and if you see any
> issues, speak up please.
> 
> I agree we don't really need to support very large values here,
> it just seemed less work.

This all looks fine to me, submit a final version to me via
whatever means you feel is appropriate.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html