netdev - Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] ipoib: remove addrlen check for mc addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100322174601.GF29129@obsidianresearch.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:46:01 -0600
From:	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, ogerlitz@...taire.com,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, monis@...taire.com
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] ipoib: remove addrlen check for mc
	addresses

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 06:26:14PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 05:59:16PM CET, jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 02:21:39PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Finally this bit can be removed. Currently, after the bonding driver is
> >> changed/fixed (32a806c194ea112cfab00f558482dd97bee5e44e net-next-2.6),
> >> that's not possible for an addr with different length than dev->addr_len
> >> to be present in list. Removing this check as in new mc_list there will be
> >> no addrlen in the record.
> >
> >Maybe just make this check a WARN_ON?
> 
> As I said, addrlen will no longer be in record (because it would have no
> meaning since length ot the addr is always dev->addr_len)

Oh, I see, sounds good then

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html