netdev - [PATCH net-next-2.6 v7 00/12] net-caif: introducing CAIF protocol stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <1269990989-12383-1-git-send-email-sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Mar 2010 01:16:29 +0200
From:	sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com
To:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, marcel@...tmann.org
Cc:	daniel.martensson@...ricsson.com, sjurbr@...il.com,
	Sjur Braendeland <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v7 00/12] net-caif: introducing CAIF protocol stack

From: Sjur Braendeland <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>

Hi David.

>You're directly accessing SKB data members instead of using
>the portable interfaces defined in linux/skbuff.h, therefore
>the build fails on 64-bit.

Sorry for the inconvenience I have caused you David.

>How many revisions of this patch set and not once has it been even
>build tested on 64-bit?
We have been doing all our testing on ARM and x86 so far,
64bit slipped our attention.

I have compiled for x86, x86-64 bit, run sparce and checkpatch -strict,
compiled with -W, and already compiled for ARM.
Do you want a new patch-set now, or would you rather wait for completion of
all checks in 'SubmitPaches'? I'm missing at least steps: 2, 3, 4, 10, 21.

BR/Sjur
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html