[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100331093956.GI4837@datarespons.se>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:39:56 +0200
From: Anders Darander <anders.darander@...arespons.se>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
Erik Waling <erik.waling@...ftel.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V2] MACB: Set PHY address in kernel parameters
* Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de> [100331 11:18]:
> We're using phy_mask in one of our projects, it's still using 2.6.29,
> though. I think it's worth testing if it's still working.
Well, that was obviously something I overlooked / misinterpreted when I
tried to solve our problem!
As I understand it, phy_mask is a bitfield for setting which PHYs should
be enabled... Then this should have worked OK for us!
> static struct at91_eth_data __initdata p298_macb_data = {
> .is_rmii = 0,
> .phy_mask = ~(1 << 8),
> };
> at91_add_device_eth(&p298_macb_data);
I've not tested it, but it should probably have worked.
Regards,
Anders
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists