[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100413.144340.138717714.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: smulcahy@...il.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, ben@...adent.org.uk, aabdulla@...dia.com,
572201@...s.debian.org
Subject: Re: forcedeth driver hangs under heavy load
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:42:21 +0200
> Le mardi 13 avril 2010 à 15:27 +0100, stephen mulcahy a écrit :
>> Ok, I've tried both of the following with my reproducer
>>
>> 1. ethtool -K eth0 tso off
>>
>> RESULT: reproducer causes multiple hosts to be come unresponsive on
>> first run.
>>
>> 2. ethtool -K eth0 tx off
>>
>> RESULT: reproducer runs three times without any hosts becoming unresponsive.
>>
>> -stephen
>
> Thanks Stephen !
>
> Now some brave fouls to check the 6410 lines of this driver ? ;)
>
> Question of the day : Why TSO is broken in forcedeth ?
> Is it generically broken or is it broken for specific NICS ?
Do you really come to the conclusion that TSO is broken with the above
test results?
I would conclude that there is a TX checksumming issue, since merely
turning TSO off does not fix the problem whereas turning TX
checksumming off does.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists