netdev - Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100415.015117.107243799.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	shemminger@...tta.com, hadi@...erus.ca, therbert@...gle.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, robert@...julf.net, xiaosuo@...il.com,
	andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:58:50 +0200

> Every time we change RPS to be on or off, we might have some extra
> noise. Maybe we already have this problem with irqbalance ?

irqbalance should never move network device interrupts around
under normal circumstances.  Arjan assured me that there is
specific logic in the irqbalance daemon to not move NIC
interrupts around once a target has been choosen.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html