[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100415.015158.58248432.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
Cc: shemminger@...tta.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, therbert@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, robert@...julf.net, xiaosuo@...il.com,
andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:22:48 -0400
> On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 12:44 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
>> RPS might also interact with the core turbo boost functionality on Intel chips.
>> Newer chips will make a single core faster if other core can be kept idle.
>
> how well does it work with Linux?
It's completely transparent and should just happen without any
BIOS tweaks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists