[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1271333428.23780.3.camel@bigi>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:10:28 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, robert@...julf.net,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 22:57 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On my Nehalem machine (16 logical cpus), its NetXtreme II BCM57711E
> 10Gigabit has 16 queues. It might be good to use less queues according
> to your results on some workloads, and eventually use RPS on a second
> layering.
Ok Eric, you seem to be running a system with two Nehalems
interconnected by QPI.
Is there any difference, performance-wise, between redirecting from
coreX to coreY when they are on the same Nehalem vs when you
are going across QPI?
cheers,
jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists