[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s2p412e6f7f1004150532y4b13a0bfgadab3e6f2f4aecd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:32:19 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, robert@...julf.net,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:10 PM, jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 22:57 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> On my Nehalem machine (16 logical cpus), its NetXtreme II BCM57711E
>> 10Gigabit has 16 queues. It might be good to use less queues according
>> to your results on some workloads, and eventually use RPS on a second
>> layering.
>
For historical reason, we use Linux-2.6.18. Our company have several
products with CPU Xen, P4, or i7. Some of them are SMP, Multi-Core and
Multi-Threaded. We use the similar mechanism like dynamic weighted
RPS. The total throughput is increased nearly linear with the number
of the worker threads(one worker thread per CPU).
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists