netdev - Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1271335844.23780.8.camel@bigi>
Date:	Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:50:44 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rps perfomance WAS(Re: rps: question

On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 20:32 +0800, Changli Gao wrote:

> For historical reason, we use Linux-2.6.18. Our company have several
> products with CPU Xen, P4, or i7. Some of them are SMP, Multi-Core and
> Multi-Threaded. 

Thanks for sharing. How much more can you say? ;-> Do you have a paper
or description of some sort somewhere?

> We use the similar mechanism like dynamic weighted
> RPS. The total throughput is increased nearly linear with the number
> of the worker threads(one worker thread per CPU).

Other than the i7 - have you tried to run rps on on the P4?

cheers,
jamal


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html