lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100421231843.4c284991@nehalam> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:18:43 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net: batch skb dequeueing from softnet input_pkt_queue On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:51:53 +0800 Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com> wrote: > + struct sk_buff *input_pkt_queue_head; > + struct sk_buff **input_pkt_queue_tailp; > + unsigned int input_pkt_queue_len; > + unsigned int process_queue_len; Why is opencoding a skb queue a step forward? Just keep using sk_queue routines, just not the locked variants. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists