netdev - Re: [PATCH v4] net: batch skb dequeueing from softnet input_pkt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:30:33 +0800
From:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net: batch skb dequeueing from softnet input_pkt_queue

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Stephen Hemminger
<shemminger@...tta.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:51:53 +0800
> Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> +     struct sk_buff          *input_pkt_queue_head;
>> +     struct sk_buff          **input_pkt_queue_tailp;
>> +     unsigned int            input_pkt_queue_len;
>> +     unsigned int            process_queue_len;
>
> Why is opencoding a skb queue a step forward?
> Just keep using sk_queue routines, just not the locked variants.
>

I want to keep the critical section of rps_lock() as small as possible
to reduce the potential lock contention, when RPS is used.

-- 
Regards，
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html