[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271921637.7895.4791.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:33:57 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: Introduce skb_orphan_try()
Le jeudi 22 avril 2010 à 00:26 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:24:05 +0200
>
> > Hmm... are you sure we want to call destructor for each skb ?
> >
> > Should'nt we do it before initial skb is split ?
>
> Good idea, therefore you mean something like this?
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 3ba774b..f3c3885 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -1865,6 +1865,7 @@ static int dev_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb)
> int features = dev->features & ~(illegal_highdma(dev, skb) ?
> NETIF_F_SG : 0);
>
> + skb_orphan_try(skb);
> segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, features);
>
> /* Verifying header integrity only. */
Yes, it seems better.
What about the
if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE)
skb_dst_drop(skb);
This thing might also be moved before the split, since split probably
clone all dst ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists