[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201004282137.28492.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:37:28 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@...co.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, chrisw@...hat.com,
Jens Osterkamp <Jens.Osterkamp@....de>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/2] Add netdev port-profile support (take III, was iovnl)
On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On 4/28/10 6:13 AM, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> > What I could imagine to unify this is something like
> >
> > ip port_profile set DEVICE [ { pre_associate | pre_associate_rr } ]
> > { name PORT-PROFILE | vsi MGR:VTID:VER }
> > mac LLADDR
> > [ vlan VID ]
> > [ host_uuid HOST_UUID ]
> > [ client_uuid CLIENT_UUID ]
> > [ client_name CLIENT_NAME ]
> > ip port_profile del DEVICE [ mac LLADDR [ vlan VID ] ]
> > ip port_profile show DEVICE
>
> Arnd, can someone test this with VDP today? I don't have access to that
> equipment so it's difficult for me to fully test the unified patch. I can
> test the previous patch with enic easily because I have access to production
> systems. I'd like to make sure someone can test this with VDP before I
> respin the patch one more time.
Sorry, but I don't have access to production hardware at this time. Jens wants to
implement both sides so we can test this in simulation mode, but it's not done
yet.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists