netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: speedup udp receive path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1272655814.3879.8.camel@bigi>
Date:	Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:30:14 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, therbert@...gle.com,
	shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>,
	Brian Bloniarz <bmb@...enacr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: speedup udp receive path

Eric!

I managed to mod your program to look conceptually similar to mine
and i reproduced the results with same test kernel from yesterday. 
So it is likely the issue is in using epoll vs not using any async as
in your case.
Results attached as well as modified program.

Note: the key things to remember:
rps with this program gets worse over time and different net-next
kernels since Apr14 (look at graph i supplied). Sorry, I am really
busy-ed out to dig any further.

cheers,
jamal



On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 16:36 -0400, jamal wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 09:56 -0400, jamal wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I will try your program instead so we can reduce the variables
> 
> Results attached.
> With your app rps does a hell lot better and non-rps worse ;->
> With my proggie, non-rps does much better than yours and rps does
> a lot worse for same setup. I see the scheduler kicking quiet a bit in
> non-rps for you...
> 
> The main difference between us as i see it is:
> a) i use epoll - actually linked to libevent (1.0.something)
> b) I fork processes and you use pthreads.
> 
> I dont have time to chase it today, but 1) I am either going to change
> yours to use libevent or make mine get rid of it then 2) move towards
> pthreads or have yours fork..
> then observe if that makes any difference..
> 
> 
> cheers,
> jamal

View attachment "apr30-ericmod" of type "text/plain" (8919 bytes)

View attachment "udpsnkfrk.c" of type "text/x-csrc" (3651 bytes)