[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1272660000.2230.4.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:40:00 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
Cc: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, therbert@...gle.com,
shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Brian Bloniarz <bmb@...enacr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: speedup udp receive path
Le vendredi 30 avril 2010 à 15:30 -0400, jamal a écrit :
> Eric!
>
> I managed to mod your program to look conceptually similar to mine
> and i reproduced the results with same test kernel from yesterday.
> So it is likely the issue is in using epoll vs not using any async as
> in your case.
> Results attached as well as modified program.
>
> Note: the key things to remember:
> rps with this program gets worse over time and different net-next
> kernels since Apr14 (look at graph i supplied). Sorry, I am really
> busy-ed out to dig any further.
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
I am lost.
I used your program, and with RPS off, I can get at most 220.000 pps
with my "old" hardware. I dont understand how you can reach 700.000 pps
with RPS off. Or is it with your Nehalem ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists