[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <EA929A9653AAE14F841771FB1DE5A1365FE55609F0@rrsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:13:47 -0600
From: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: RE: ixgbe and mac-vlans problem
Ben Greear wrote:
> On 04/30/2010 11:00 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Friday 30 April 2010 00:27:39 Ben Greear wrote:
>>> Basically, we create 50 mac-vlans, with sequential MAC addresses
>>> and sequential IP addresses, and set up ip rules properly.
>>>
>>> The issue is that only 10 or so of the mac-vlans receive other than
>>> broadcast packets. The ixgbe NIC doesn't show PROMISC mode.
>>
>> I just took a brief look at the driver and noticed that 82599 should
>> be able to handle 128 entries before going into promisc mode, while
>> 82598 (the same driver) does 16.
>>
>> Maybe the logic for>16 entries is wrong, so you could try forcing
>> hw->mac.num_rar_entries to 16 for 82599 as well.
>
> I think I was actually on an 825998 system when I saw it yesterday,
> but I have seen similar issues on 82599, though I didn't take time
> to debug it fully, so it could have been something else.
>
> I will double-check the NIC chipset on the system that showed the
> problem yesterday.
I ran a quick test in my setup with 82599 and was able to pass traffic
on all 50 mac-vlans without issues. This is on net-next.
Thanks,
Emil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists