netdev - Re: r8169 INFO: inconsistent lock state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:15:56 +0200
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: r8169 INFO: inconsistent lock state

Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> :
[...]
> So we have following illegal chain (process context, not softirq)
> 
> rtl8169_reset_task() -> tl8169_rx_interrupt() -> netif_receive_skb()
> 
> And normally, commit 630b943c tried to change this chain to :
> 
> rtl8169_reset_task() -> tl8169_rx_interrupt() -> netif_rx()
> 
> I have no idea why it doesnt work.

630b943c appears to be in net-next.

Oops ?

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html