[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <o2u412e6f7f1005010324sfb63393fo86acdff4c97c5be3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 18:24:00 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: hadi@...erus.ca, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
therbert@...gle.com, shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Brian Bloniarz <bmb@...enacr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: speedup udp receive path
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, using ee mask, cpu4 is not used at _all_, even for the user
> threads. Scheduler does a bad job IMHO.
>
> Using fe mask, I get all packets (sent at 733311pps by my pktgen
> machine), and my CPU0 even has idle time !!!
>
> Limit seems to be around 800.000 pps
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> PerfTop: 5616 irqs/sec kernel:93.9% [1000Hz cycles], (all, 8 CPUs)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Oh, cpu0 usage is about 100-(100-93.9)*8 = 51.2%(Am I right?). If we
can do weighted packet distributing: cpu0's weight is 1, and other
cpus are 2. maybe we can utilize all the cpu power.
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists