lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 12:47:29 +0200 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com> Cc: hadi@...erus.ca, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, therbert@...gle.com, shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>, Brian Bloniarz <bmb@...enacr.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: speedup udp receive path Le samedi 01 mai 2010 à 18:24 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit : > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote: > > > > BTW, using ee mask, cpu4 is not used at _all_, even for the user > > threads. Scheduler does a bad job IMHO. > > > > Using fe mask, I get all packets (sent at 733311pps by my pktgen > > machine), and my CPU0 even has idle time !!! > > > > Limit seems to be around 800.000 pps > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > PerfTop: 5616 irqs/sec kernel:93.9% [1000Hz cycles], (all, 8 CPUs) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Oh, cpu0 usage is about 100-(100-93.9)*8 = 51.2%(Am I right?). If we > can do weighted packet distributing: cpu0's weight is 1, and other > cpus are 2. maybe we can utilize all the cpu power. > Nope, cpu0 was at 100% in this test, other cpus were about at 50% each. weigthed would be ok if I wanted to use cpu0 in the 'slave' cpus (RPS targets). But I know the workload I am interested to, and ability to resist to DDOS, want to keep cpu0 outside of IP/TCP/UDP stack. Later, skb_pull() inline in eth_type_trans() permitted to reach 840.000 pps. top - 12:42:55 up 3:00, 2 users, load average: 0.44, 0.11, 0.03 Tasks: 126 total, 1 running, 125 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 2.2%us, 16.5%sy, 0.0%ni, 46.5%id, 11.4%wa, 0.9%hi, 22.5%si, 0.0%st Mem: 4148112k total, 211152k used, 3936960k free, 15228k buffers Swap: 4192928k total, 0k used, 4192928k free, 121804k cached You can see average idle of 46% So there is probably more optimizations to do to reach maybe 1.300.000 pps ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists