lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1272838104.2173.166.camel@edumazet-laptop> Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 00:08:24 +0200 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hadi@...erus.ca, xiaosuo@...il.com, therbert@...gle.com, shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org, arjan@...radead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] net: batch skb dequeueing from softnet input_pkt_queue Le dimanche 02 mai 2010 à 23:54 +0200, Andi Kleen a écrit : > On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 11:45:55PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Tests just prove the reverse. > > What do you mean? > Test I did this week with Jamal. We first set a "ee" rps mask, because all NIC interrupts were handled by CPU0, and Jamal thought like you, that not using cpu4 would give better performance. But using "fe" mask gave me a bonus, from ~700.000 pps to ~800.000 pps CPU : E5450 @3.00GHz Two quad-core cpus in the machine, tg3 NIC. With RPS, CPU0 does not a lot of things, just talk with the NIC, bring a few cache lines per packet and dispatch it to a slave cpu. > HT (especially Nehalem HT) is useful for a wide range of workloads. > Just handling network interrupts for its thread sibling is not one of them. > Thats the theory, now in practice I see different results. Of course, this might be related to hash distribution being different and more uniform. I should redo the test with many more flows. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists