lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1272838104.2173.166.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Mon, 03 May 2010 00:08:24 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hadi@...erus.ca,
	xiaosuo@...il.com, therbert@...gle.com, shemminger@...tta.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org, arjan@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] net: batch skb dequeueing from softnet
 input_pkt_queue

Le dimanche 02 mai 2010 à 23:54 +0200, Andi Kleen a écrit :
> On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 11:45:55PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> > Tests just prove the reverse.
> 
> What do you mean? 
> 

Test I did this week with Jamal.

We first set a "ee" rps mask, because all NIC interrupts were handled by
CPU0, and Jamal thought like you, that not using cpu4 would give better
performance.

But using "fe" mask gave me a bonus, from ~700.000 pps to ~800.000 pps

CPU : E5450  @3.00GHz
Two quad-core cpus in the machine, tg3 NIC.

With RPS, CPU0 does not a lot of things, just talk with the NIC, bring a
few cache lines per packet and dispatch it to a slave cpu.



> HT (especially Nehalem HT) is useful for a wide range of workloads.
> Just handling network interrupts for its thread sibling is not one of them.
> 

Thats the theory, now in practice I see different results.

Of course, this might be related to hash distribution being different
and more uniform.

I should redo the test with many more flows.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ