lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1272847591.30040.15.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 17:46:31 -0700 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>, Alex Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>, PJ Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>, John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH] ixgb and e1000: Use new function for copybreak tests There appears to be an off-by-1 defect in the maximum packet size copied when copybreak is speified in these modules. The copybreak module params are specified as: "Maximum size of packet that is copied to a new buffer on receive" The tests are changed from "< copybreak" to "<= copybreak" and moved into new static functions for readability. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> --- drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------- drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_main.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c index e6ebc22..2adc83c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c @@ -3773,6 +3773,31 @@ next_desc: return cleaned; } +/* + * this should improve performance for small packets with large amounts + * of reassembly being done in the stack + */ +static void e1000_check_copybreak(struct net_device *netdev, + struct e1000_buffer *buffer_info, + u32 length, struct sk_buff **skb) +{ + struct sk_buff *new_skb; + + if (length > copybreak) + return; + + new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, length); + if (!new_skb) + return; + + skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(new_skb, -NET_IP_ALIGN, + (*skb)->data - NET_IP_ALIGN, + length + NET_IP_ALIGN); + /* save the skb in buffer_info as good */ + buffer_info->skb = *skb; + *skb = new_skb; +} + /** * e1000_clean_rx_irq - Send received data up the network stack; legacy * @adapter: board private structure @@ -3871,26 +3896,8 @@ static bool e1000_clean_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, total_rx_bytes += length; total_rx_packets++; - /* code added for copybreak, this should improve - * performance for small packets with large amounts - * of reassembly being done in the stack */ - if (length < copybreak) { - struct sk_buff *new_skb = - netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, length); - if (new_skb) { - skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(new_skb, - -NET_IP_ALIGN, - (skb->data - - NET_IP_ALIGN), - (length + - NET_IP_ALIGN)); - /* save the skb in buffer_info as good */ - buffer_info->skb = skb; - skb = new_skb; - } - /* else just continue with the old one */ - } - /* end copybreak code */ + e1000_check_copybreak(netdev, buffer_info, length, &skb); + skb_put(skb, length); /* Receive Checksum Offload */ diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_main.c b/drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_main.c index d58ca6b..c6b75c8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ixgb/ixgb_main.c @@ -1921,6 +1921,31 @@ ixgb_rx_checksum(struct ixgb_adapter *adapter, } } +/* + * this should improve performance for small packets with large amounts + * of reassembly being done in the stack + */ +static void ixgb_check_copybreak(struct net_device *netdev, + struct ixgb_buffer *buffer_info, + u32 length, struct sk_buff **skb) +{ + struct sk_buff *new_skb; + + if (length > copybreak) + return; + + new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, length); + if (!new_skb) + return; + + skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(new_skb, -NET_IP_ALIGN, + (*skb)->data - NET_IP_ALIGN, + length + NET_IP_ALIGN); + /* save the skb in buffer_info as good */ + buffer_info->skb = *skb; + *skb = new_skb; +} + /** * ixgb_clean_rx_irq - Send received data up the network stack, * @adapter: board private structure @@ -1957,11 +1982,14 @@ ixgb_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgb_adapter *adapter, int *work_done, int work_to_do) prefetch(skb->data - NET_IP_ALIGN); - if (++i == rx_ring->count) i = 0; + if (++i == rx_ring->count) + i = 0; next_rxd = IXGB_RX_DESC(*rx_ring, i); prefetch(next_rxd); - if ((j = i + 1) == rx_ring->count) j = 0; + j = i + 1; + if (j == rx_ring->count) + j = 0; next2_buffer = &rx_ring->buffer_info[j]; prefetch(next2_buffer); @@ -1997,25 +2025,7 @@ ixgb_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgb_adapter *adapter, int *work_done, int work_to_do) goto rxdesc_done; } - /* code added for copybreak, this should improve - * performance for small packets with large amounts - * of reassembly being done in the stack */ - if (length < copybreak) { - struct sk_buff *new_skb = - netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, length); - if (new_skb) { - skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(new_skb, - -NET_IP_ALIGN, - (skb->data - - NET_IP_ALIGN), - (length + - NET_IP_ALIGN)); - /* save the skb in buffer_info as good */ - buffer_info->skb = skb; - skb = new_skb; - } - } - /* end copybreak code */ + ixgb_check_copybreak(netdev, buffer_info, length, &skb); /* Good Receive */ skb_put(skb, length); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists