[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1005031401100.4376@jbrandeb-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 14:02:25 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: "stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"brandon@...p.org" <brandon@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] ixgbe: Fix return of invalid txq
putting davem on to: line... sorry for not including on first email.
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> Please consider commit fdd3d631cddad20ad9d3e1eb7dbf26825a8a121f for
> inclusion in 2.6.32.y (it is already in 2.6.33.y)
>
> Here is the commit message, it fixes a panic on machines with a larger
> number of cpus than ixgbe has tx queues (64).
>
> commit fdd3d631cddad20ad9d3e1eb7dbf26825a8a121f
> Author: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
> Date: Wed Feb 3 13:13:10 2010 +0000
>
> ixgbe: Fix return of invalid txq
>
> a developer had complained of getting lots of warnings:
>
> "eth16 selects TX queue 98, but real number of TX queues is 64"
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02200.html
>
> As there was no follow up on that bug, I am submitting this
> patch assuming that the other return points will not return
> invalid txq's, and also that this fixes the bug (not tested).
>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists