[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100506123855.735a164a@nehalam>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 12:38:55 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] bridge netfilter: use net_ratelimit
Remove routine br_dnat_complain which just implemented own version
of net_ratelimit() and use netdev_warn.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c 2010-05-06 12:32:23.427786161 -0700
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter.c 2010-05-06 12:33:37.826565965 -0700
@@ -253,17 +253,6 @@ static int br_nf_pre_routing_finish_ipv6
return 0;
}
-static void __br_dnat_complain(void)
-{
- static unsigned long last_complaint;
-
- if (jiffies - last_complaint >= 5 * HZ) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "Performing cross-bridge DNAT requires IP "
- "forwarding to be enabled\n");
- last_complaint = jiffies;
- }
-}
-
/* This requires some explaining. If DNAT has taken place,
* we will need to fix up the destination Ethernet address,
* and this is a tricky process.
@@ -382,8 +371,12 @@ static int br_nf_pre_routing_finish(stru
/* we are sure that forwarding is disabled, so printing
* this message is no problem. Note that the packet could
* still have a martian destination address, in which case
- * the packet could be dropped even if forwarding were enabled */
- __br_dnat_complain();
+ * the packet could be dropped even if forwarding were enabled
+ */
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ netdev_warn(dev, "Performing cross-bridge DNAT "
+ "requires IP forwarding to be enabled\n");
+
dst_release((struct dst_entry *)rt);
}
free_skb:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists