netdev - Re: QoS weirdness : HTB accuracy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e6bd0cff8dafc8b3af0760facb5fdc8c@localhost>
Date:	Sat, 22 May 2010 16:29:21 +0200
From:	Julien Vehent <julien@...uxwall.info>
To:	"Philip A. Prindeville" <philipp_subx@...fish-solutions.com>
Cc:	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	netfilter <netfilter@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: QoS weirdness : HTB accuracy

On Tue, 18 May 2010 18:07:12 -0600, "Philip A. Prindeville"
<philipp_subx@...fish-solutions.com> wrote:
> 
> Sorry for the late response:  could this be an "aliasing" issue caused
> by sampling intervals (granularity)?
> 
> -Philip

I was, in fact, an error in my ruleset. I had put the 'linklayer atm' at
both the branch and leaf levels, so the overhead was computed twice,
creating those holes in the bandwidth.

Julien
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html