netdev - Re: Question about an assignment in handle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1274793216.3878.947.camel@bigi>
Date:	Tue, 25 May 2010 09:13:36 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: Question about an assignment in handle_ing()

On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 22:46 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:

> That's not very surprising as you're not checking whether the
> skb is cloned in act_pedit.c:

I meant the test "if (skb_cloned(skb))" failed in such cases;-> So you
couldnt reliably use it. 
If it turns out it is unnecessary, what you describe is what i had in
mind as well.

> BTW, this error handling also looks a bit suss.  Shouldn't it
> drop the packet instead of continuing as if we have successfully
> modified it?

It is not the responsibility of the action to drop packets in a pipeline
rather the responsibility is that of the caller (ref: rule #3 in
Documentation/networking/tc-actions-env-rules.txt). What to do on a
failure such as above is programmable by the action user/admin.

Anyways, now i am really gone. Dont make me look in again Herbert ;->

cheers,
jamal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html