[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100525231307.GA19475@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:13:07 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: Question about an assignment in handle_ing()
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:13:36AM -0400, jamal wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 22:46 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> > That's not very surprising as you're not checking whether the
> > skb is cloned in act_pedit.c:
>
> I meant the test "if (skb_cloned(skb))" failed in such cases;-> So you
> couldnt reliably use it.
> If it turns out it is unnecessary, what you describe is what i had in
> mind as well.
If it did happen like you said then it would be a serious bug
in our stack as everything else (including the TCP stack) relies
on this.
You can't just make up your own rules :)
> It is not the responsibility of the action to drop packets in a pipeline
> rather the responsibility is that of the caller (ref: rule #3 in
> Documentation/networking/tc-actions-env-rules.txt). What to do on a
> failure such as above is programmable by the action user/admin.
But how can the caller make that decision when you return exactly
the same value in the error case as the normal case?
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists