[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275313448.3291.49.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 15:44:08 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: xtables: stackptr should be percpu
Le lundi 31 mai 2010 à 15:22 +0200, Jan Engelhardt a écrit :
> On Monday 2010-05-31 15:13, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> >All cpus share a single cache line for their 'stackptr' storage,
> >introduced in commit f3c5c1bfd4
> >
> >This is a stable candidate (2.6.34)
>
> Stackptr was first introduced for 2.6.35-rcX.
>
Indeed, I was fooled by 'git describe'
> >+ i->stackptr = alloc_percpu(unsigned int);
> > if (i->stackptr == NULL)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >- memset(i->stackptr, 0, size);
> >
> > size = sizeof(void **) * nr_cpu_ids;
> > if (size > PAGE_SIZE)
>
> Are alloc_percpu areas cleared?
>
Yes, allocated chunks are cleared.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists